[ still catching up on old email ]
I wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 09/11/2013 02:30 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Note that I was proposing removing libpq's support for V2 connections.
Not the backend's.
I
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
[ still catching up on old email ]
I wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 09/11/2013 02:30 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Note that I was proposing
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I vote against this. If we remove V2 support from libpq, then we'll
have no easy way to test that the backend's support still works. And
we've got too many people using V2 to think that it's OK not to have
an easy way
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 09/11/2013 02:30 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Note that I was proposing removing libpq's support for V2 connections.
Not the backend's.
I vote against this. If we remove V2 support
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2013-09-10 12:31:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've been thinking of late that it might be time to retire
On 09/11/2013 02:30 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2013-09-10 12:31:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've been
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:55:30PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2013-09-10 12:31:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Maciek Sakrejda m.sakre...@gmail.com writes:
One of our customers seems to be running into exactly the issue
hypothesized about by Tom here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8040.1314403...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Was the
On 2013-09-10 12:31:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Maciek Sakrejda m.sakre...@gmail.com writes:
One of our customers seems to be running into exactly the issue
hypothesized about by Tom here:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2013-09-10 12:31:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've been thinking of late that it might be time to retire libpq's
support for V2 protocol (other than in the specific context
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2013-09-10 12:31:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've been thinking of late that it might be time to retire
Maciek Sakrejda m.sakre...@gmail.com writes:
One of our customers seems to be running into exactly the issue
hypothesized about by Tom here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8040.1314403...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Was the possibility of an inadvertent protocol downgrade addressed as part
of that
12 matches
Mail list logo
