Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:06:16PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote: Hi Magnus. configure was changed the cvs head. Is this what you intended it?_? I think necessary to recover it. *** configure.orig Tue Apr 3 17:51:06 2007 --- configure Tue Apr 3 17:52:21 2007 *** ***

Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi. Am I misunderstanding it? That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead. Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-) Ooops, Isn't pthreadGC2 necessary? Slony-I is still

Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote: Hi. Am I misunderstanding it? That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead. Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for

Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Dave Page
Magnus Hagander wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote: Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet. Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be. And to port the

Re: [HACKERS] PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

2007-04-03 Thread Hiroshi Saito
From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Magnus Hagander wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote: Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet. Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as well, but I haven't looked at how much