Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION?

2006-07-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Mario Weilguni wrote: Will this patch make it into 8.2? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools like pgpool.

Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION?

2006-07-23 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Mario Weilguni wrote: Will this patch make it into 8.2? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools like pgpool. No, it will not

Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION?

2006-07-19 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
Will this patch make it into 8.2? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools like pgpool. No, it will not because RESET CONNECTION can mess up interface code that doesn't want the

Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION?

2006-07-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Mario Weilguni wrote: Will this patch make it into 8.2? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools like pgpool. No, it will not because RESET

Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION?

2006-07-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: I'm disappointed. Can you point out past discussion for this? Yes: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-01/msg00029.php --- -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan Mario

Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION?

2006-07-18 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bruce Momjian wrote: Mario Weilguni wrote: Will this patch make it into 8.2? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools like pgpool. No, it will not because RESET CONNECTION can mess up interface

Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION?

2006-07-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Mario Weilguni wrote: Will this patch make it into 8.2? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools like pgpool. No, it will not because RESET CONNECTION can mess up interface code that doesn't want the

Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION?

2006-07-13 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
I'm disappointed. Can you point out past discussion for this? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan Mario Weilguni wrote: Will this patch make it into 8.2? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools

Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION idea

2005-06-07 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: What if we create a 'reset_connection' guc that is initially false, and is set to 'true' when someone resets a connection. Then, when it happens, the client finds out, reconfigures whatever it needs, then sets the value back to 'false'. It seems to

Re: [HACKERS] RESET CONNECTION behavior

2005-06-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: Can we get a list features we want for RESET CONNECTION? At this point, I see ideas but no consistent approach. Some say protocol only, others say an SQL command is fine, but the protocol has to find out it happened somehow. Is that a plan? I have enhanced our TODO for