On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
But note that the current behavior is worse in this regard. If you specify
a scale of 4 at the column level, than it is not possible to distinguish
between 5.000 and 5. on a per-value basis within that column. If the
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Sure, but the point is that 5. is not the same as 5.000 today. If
you start whacking this around you'll be changing that behavior, I
think.
Yeah. And please note that no
On 09/06/2013 07:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
But I wonder if we could just declare that that's not what the scale typmod
does. That it's just a maximum scale but it's perfectly valid for NUMERIC
data with lower scales to be stored
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Sure, but the point is that 5. is not the same as 5.000 today. If
you start whacking this around you'll be changing that behavior, I
think.
Yeah. And please note that no matter what the OP may think, a lot of
people *do* consider that there's a
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 09/06/2013 07:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
But I wonder if we could just declare that that's not what the scale typmod
does. That it's just a maximum
