Andres Freund writes:
> On 2017-04-17 19:26:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we are going to go down this road, I think it would be a good idea
>> to try to provide a cursor position for the "can't accept a set" error
>> message, because otherwise it will be really unclear
On 2017-04-17 19:26:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I'm a bit inclined to agree with the idea of explicitly requiring SRFs
> > in FROM to appear only at the top level of the expression.
>
> If we are going to go down this road, I think it would be a good idea
> to try to provide a cursor
I wrote:
> I'm a bit inclined to agree with the idea of explicitly requiring SRFs
> in FROM to appear only at the top level of the expression.
If we are going to go down this road, I think it would be a good idea
to try to provide a cursor position for the "can't accept a set" error
message,
Robert Haas writes:
> So I'm not sure what the right thing to do here is.
Andres' points about composite vs noncomposite function result types
seem pretty compelling: we could make the behavior better for scalar
results, but if it then diverges from what happens for
On 2017-04-13 12:53:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > This yields plenty weird behaviour in < v10. E.g. the following is
> > disallowed:
> > SELECT * FROM int4mul(generate_series(1,3), 1);
> > ERROR: 0A000: set-valued
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> This yields plenty weird behaviour in < v10. E.g. the following is
> disallowed:
> SELECT * FROM int4mul(generate_series(1,3), 1);
> ERROR: 0A000: set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a
> set
>
On 2017-04-05 09:39:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2017-04-05 02:47:55 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
>
> > I've a very preliminary patch. I'd like to only start polishing it up
> >
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 12:16:25AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-04-05 02:47:55 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:49:46AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2017-03-09 13:34:22 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2017-04-05 02:47:55 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
>> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
> I've a very preliminary patch. I'd like to only start polishing it up
> once the code freeze is over, so I can work on getting
On 2017-04-05 02:47:55 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:49:46AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2017-03-09 13:34:22 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Andres Freund writes:
> > >
10 matches
Mail list logo