Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Peter, I assume SET CONSTRAINTS can't control a domain's constraints ---
> > it isn't actually a data object in the transaction. Am I right?
>
> No. SET CONSTRAINTS on a domain constraint should affect all constraints
> on columns that use t
OK, added to TODO:
Allow SET CONSTRAINTS to be qualified by schema/table
Peter, I assume SET CONSTRAINTS can't control a domain's constraints ---
it isn't actually a data object in the transaction. Am I right?
---
