ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we provide 'external initializer', some of your proposals can be done
> through more generalized way, at least the foreign key test. ...
> Are you interested in this idea?
Sounds good to me --- this seems to follow along with Tatsuo's recent
work t
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Would it be worthwhile to add a switch so that the foreign key test is
> >> only used "if" they use the switch in conjunction with a -i?
> >
> > I wouldn't object to providing that as a (non default) option.
>
> O.k. I will take a look at what t
