Re: [HACKERS] Store data in pg_toast for custom type fails (bug?)

2014-05-01 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > I believe I understand what's going on here, and it's not quite as > exciting as it first appears. The issue is that we are failing to > honor the "toasting goes only one level deep" rule in the specific > case of arrays of composite type. So while it's definitely a nasty > bug, it aff

Re: [HACKERS] Store data in pg_toast for custom type fails (bug?)

2014-04-22 Thread Tom Lane
Honza writes: > On 03/28/2014 07:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I believe I understand what's going on here, and it's not quite as >> exciting as it first appears. The issue is that we are failing to >> honor the "toasting goes only one level deep" rule in the specific >> case of arrays of composite t

Re: [HACKERS] Store data in pg_toast for custom type fails (bug?)

2014-04-22 Thread Honza
On 03/28/2014 07:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: >> Honza writes: >>> after a months I've found a time to make test-case for this bug, probably: > >> Confirmed that this reproduces a problem on HEAD. Will look into it, >> thanks! > > I believe I understand what's going on here, and it's not

Re: [HACKERS] Store data in pg_toast for custom type fails (bug?)

2014-03-28 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > Honza writes: >> after a months I've found a time to make test-case for this bug, probably: > Confirmed that this reproduces a problem on HEAD. Will look into it, > thanks! I believe I understand what's going on here, and it's not quite as exciting as it first appears. The issue is

Re: [HACKERS] Store data in pg_toast for custom type fails (bug?)

2014-03-28 Thread Tom Lane
Honza writes: > after a months I've found a time to make test-case for this bug, probably: Confirmed that this reproduces a problem on HEAD. Will look into it, thanks! regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make chan