Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication and privilege

2010-03-08 Thread Fujii Masao
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
 On 3/4/10 2:47 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
 This TODO item really needs to be addressed for 9.0? Frankly I'm not
 familiar with that area, so I've not work on it at all yet, but I'm
 going to create the patch if many people want it for 9.0. What is
 your opinion?

 I think it falls under nice to have, but not essential for 9.0.

Agreed. I moved it from TODO list for v9.0 to that for future release.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication and privilege

2010-03-04 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Currently superuser privilege is required when the standby connects
 to the primary. But there is the complaint that we should add new
 privilege for replication and use it instead of superuser because
 current approach is not good for security (*1). This has been listed
 as one of TODO items of SR.

 This TODO item really needs to be addressed for 9.0? Frankly I'm not
 familiar with that area, so I've not work on it at all yet, but I'm
 going to create the patch if many people want it for 9.0. What is
 your opinion?

 (*1)
 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg01536.php

In my opinion, it is a 9.1 item.

...Robert

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication and privilege

2010-03-04 Thread Josh Berkus
On 3/4/10 2:47 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
 This TODO item really needs to be addressed for 9.0? Frankly I'm not
 familiar with that area, so I've not work on it at all yet, but I'm
 going to create the patch if many people want it for 9.0. What is
 your opinion?

I think it falls under nice to have, but not essential for 9.0.

--Josh Berkus

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers