Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT

2017-06-21 Thread Thomas Munro
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Gierth wrote: >> "Thomas" == Thomas Munro writes: > > Thomas> That accidentally removed a comment that I wanted to keep. > Thomas> Here is a better version. > > I plan to commit this soon;

Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT

2017-06-18 Thread Andrew Gierth
> "Thomas" == Thomas Munro writes: Thomas> That accidentally removed a comment that I wanted to keep. Thomas> Here is a better version. I plan to commit this soon; if anyone has any comment to make, now would be a good time. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT

2017-06-12 Thread Thomas Munro
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Munro > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >>> I suppose you'll need two tuplestores for the

Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT

2017-06-11 Thread Thomas Munro
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> I suppose you'll need two tuplestores for the ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE >> case -- one for updated tuples, and the other for inserted tuples.