Hi,
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 22:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
A control variable was added in this commit:
commit db84ba65ab5c0ad0b34d68ab5a687bc5f4ca3ba6
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Thanks Bruce, apparently I missed it.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 13:22 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us
wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:46:28PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tor, 2012-05-03 at 15:47 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter, where are we on this?
I
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:06:50AM +0300, Devrim Gunduz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 13:22 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us
wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:46:28PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tor, 2012-05-03 at 15:47
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:46:28PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tor, 2012-05-03 at 15:47 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter, where are we on this?
I hadn't received any clear feedback, but if no one objects, I can
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:46:28PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tor, 2012-05-03 at 15:47 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter, where are we on this?
I hadn't received any clear feedback, but if no one objects, I can
commit it.
I think there were enough people that wanted some kind of
On tor, 2012-05-03 at 15:47 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter, where are we on this?
I hadn't received any clear feedback, but if no one objects, I can
commit it.
---
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 08:16:59PM +0300, Peter
Peter, where are we on this?
---
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 08:16:59PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On fre, 2012-03-23 at 07:52 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 06:05:30PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 08:16:59PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On fre, 2012-03-23 at 07:52 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 06:05:30PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked
On fre, 2012-03-23 at 07:52 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 06:05:30PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the
fact that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of jue mar 22 19:05:30 -0300 2012:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the fact
that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to use my
capslock key (which I use as a
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 06:05:30PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the
fact that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to
use my capslock key (which I use as a second control
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:51:16AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of jue mar 22 19:05:30 -0300 2012:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the
fact that I could post
On 22 March 2012 22:05, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the fact
that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to use my
capslock key (which I use as a second
On 03/23/2012 11:07 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On 22 March 2012 22:05, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the fact
that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 22 March 2012 22:05, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Should it be governed by a setting?
Perhaps, but I find the behaviour that was introduced by Peter's patch
to be a more preferable default.
FWIW, I like the new behavior better
On 23 March 2012 15:13, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Upper casing SQL keywords is a common style, which is used in lots of our
code (e.g. regression tests, psql queries, pg_dump). I think the default
should match what is in effect our house style, and what we have
historically
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:49:55 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
Postgres 9.2 has been modified so psql no longer uppercases SQL keywords
when using tab completation, by this commit:
commit 69f4f1c3576abc535871c6cfa95539e32a36120f
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Date:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the fact
that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to use my
capslock key (which I use as a second control key). Any chance of
reverting this change?
Should it be
18 matches
Mail list logo
