Re: [HACKERS] Why PostgreSQL doesn't implement a semi sync replication?

2016-11-13 Thread 余森彬
在 2016/11/12 上午11:27, Craig Ringer 写道: On 12 November 2016 at 02:12, Petr Jelinek wrote: On 11/11/16 16:03, Francisco Olarte wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:40 AM, 余森彬 wrote: As we know, the synchronous commit process is blocked while receives from acknowledgement from standby in Pos

Re: [HACKERS] Why PostgreSQL doesn't implement a semi sync replication?

2016-11-11 Thread Craig Ringer
On 12 November 2016 at 02:12, Petr Jelinek wrote: > On 11/11/16 16:03, Francisco Olarte wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:40 AM, 余森彬 wrote: >>> As we know, the synchronous commit process is blocked while receives >>> from acknowledgement from standby in >>> PostgreSQL.This is good for data

Re: [HACKERS] Why PostgreSQL doesn't implement a semi sync replication?

2016-11-11 Thread Petr Jelinek
On 11/11/16 16:03, Francisco Olarte wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:40 AM, 余森彬 wrote: >> As we know, the synchronous commit process is blocked while receives >> from acknowledgement from standby in >> PostgreSQL.This is good for data consistence in master and standby, and >> application can

Re: [HACKERS] Why PostgreSQL doesn't implement a semi sync replication?

2016-11-11 Thread Francisco Olarte
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:40 AM, 余森彬 wrote: > As we know, the synchronous commit process is blocked while receives > from acknowledgement from standby in > PostgreSQL.This is good for data consistence in master and standby, and > application can get important data from standby.But > when the s