Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - who cares?

2003-02-01 Thread Kaare Rasmussen
IMHO, replication, performance improvements, cross-db queries, etc is much better use of time than Windows port. Because you don't use Windows. On a personal level, I couldn't agree more. But I have been in a project where they chose MySQL because it had to run on Windows. I would like to be

Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - who cares?

2003-01-31 Thread ow
IMHO, replication, performance improvements, cross-db queries, etc is much better use of time than Windows port. --- Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For MySQL: There is no Cygwin needed. Period. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus -

Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - who cares?

2003-01-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 22:30:45 -0800, ow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO, replication, performance improvements, cross-db queries, etc is much better use of time than Windows port. Welcome to open source where individual people get to decide what is most important to spend their time on.