IMHO, replication, performance improvements, cross-db queries, etc is
much better use of time than Windows port.
Because you don't use Windows. On a personal level, I couldn't agree more. But
I have been in a project where they chose MySQL because it had to run on
Windows. I would like to be
IMHO, replication, performance improvements, cross-db queries, etc is
much better use of time than Windows port.
--- Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For MySQL:
There is no Cygwin needed. Period.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus -
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 22:30:45 -0800,
ow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO, replication, performance improvements, cross-db queries, etc is
much better use of time than Windows port.
Welcome to open source where individual people get to decide what is most
important to spend their time on.