> > I have spare licences for most versions of Windows as well, so if
> Microsoft's virtual server product is not too expensive for us I
> can probably add a few platform variations to that box. I'll look
> into it.
>
> In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days ago
> (http://www.m
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Kris Jurka wrote:
For my cygwin buildfarm member I setup cron, but the make step
failed for every build for unknown reasons while succeeding if not
run from cron.
Is this still happening? We should try to get to the bottom of it.
Try s
Dave Page wrote:
It seems that VMWare are following suit - their entry level VMWare
Server is now free for Windows and Linux :-)
http://www.vmware.com/products/server/
It has been for some time, at least in Beta, so I'm not sure who really
went first.
We should be supplying a sample
> -Original Message-
> From: Petr Jelinek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2006 18:05
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > I have spare licences for most versions of Windows as well,
On 7/16/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kris Jurka wrote:>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:>>> [windows buildfarm machines run irregularly]>> For my part the difficulty is scheduling. As a primarily unix user I
> understand cron, but have no idea what the windows equivalent is
Kris Jurka wrote:
For my cygwin buildfarm member I setup cron, but the make step
failed for every build for unknown reasons while succeeding if not run
from cron.
Is this still happening? We should try to get to the bottom of it.
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadca
"Dave Page" writes:
>> In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days ago
>> (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtualpc/default.mspx)
> Yeah - I have licences for it, but it's more of an interactive emulator. I
> think I'll need the server version to run fully unattended.
Surely w
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2006 19:04
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Cc: Tom Lane; Andrew Dunstan; Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
>
> Andrew, Tom:
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2006 18:17
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
>
> care to share that script ? I set up seahorse on friday but as a
> unix
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2006 18:47
> To: Andrew Dunstan
> Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
>
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTEC
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day?
>
>> Let's go for 6, at least for HEAD.
>
> There's probably no need to check the back branches oftener than once a
> day, but if you can
Andrew, Tom:
I'm putting a solicitation in this week's PWN for more Windows buildfarm
members. With 250,000 Windows+PostgreSQL users out there, you'd think a few
people would step up.
Dave, I think you may need to give Andrew Windows buildfarm instructions to
put up at www.pgbuildfarm.org.
-
-Original Message-
From: "Petr Jelinek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dave Page"
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development"
Sent: 16/07/06 18:05
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
> In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days ago
> (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virt
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day?
> Let's go for 6, at least for HEAD.
There's probably no need to check the back branches oftener than once a
day, but if you can do HEAD every 4 hours that'd
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane
Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:29 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
AFAICT, snake is the only Windows machine that
actually runs the buildfarm on a
Dave Page wrote:
I have spare licences for most versions of Windows as well, so if Microsoft's
virtual server product is not too expensive for us I can probably add a few
platform variations to that box. I'll look into it.
In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days ago
(http
Kris Jurka wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
[windows buildfarm machines run irregularly]
For my part the difficulty is scheduling. As a primarily unix user I
understand cron, but have no idea what the windows equivalent is. For
my cygwin buildfarm member I setup cron, but the
-Original Message-
From: Kris Jurka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:44 PM
To: Tom Lane
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Dave Page
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
> For my part the difficulty is scheduling. As a primarily unix use
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane
Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:29 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
> AFAICT, snake is the only Windows machine that
> actually runs the buildfarm on a regular schedule
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
[windows buildfarm machines run irregularly]
For my part the difficulty is scheduling. As a primarily unix user I
understand cron, but have no idea what the windows equivalent is. For my
cygwin buildfarm member I setup cron, but the make step failed f
20 matches
Mail list logo
