Re: [HACKERS] Wrong definition of pgwin32_bind.

Michael Paquier writes: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > wrote: >> The third parameter should be int, not int*. It might have been >> confused with pgwin32_accept. > Nice catch. David Rowley reported this a bit

Re: [HACKERS] Wrong definition of pgwin32_bind.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > Hello. > > VC complains that pgwin32_bind() had a parameter differs in > levels of indirection from definition. pgwin32_bind() in > src/backend/port/win32/socket.c is defined as the following. > >> int