Re: [HACKERS] XML regression test failure

2007-02-14 Thread Tom Lane
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > sponge failed the XML regression test once today: > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=sponge&dt=2007-02-14%2007:30:02 > If i read that correctly we could just add a simple "ORDER BY > table_name" to that query to get a more rel

Re: [HACKERS] XML regression test failure

2007-01-21 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 08:36 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Neil Conway wrote: > > >> The regression.diffs are attached. Note that this reproduces > > >> consistently, but only occurs if I use the "runtest" Makefile > > >> targ

Re: [HACKERS] XML regression test failure

2007-01-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Neil Conway wrote: > >> The regression.diffs are attached. Note that this reproduces > >> consistently, but only occurs if I use the "runtest" Makefile > >> target (i.e. run the regression tests in serial mode); "make > >> check" wo

Re: [HACKERS] XML regression test failure

2007-01-20 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Conway wrote: >> The regression.diffs are attached. Note that this reproduces >> consistently, but only occurs if I use the "runtest" Makefile target >> (i.e. run the regression tests in serial mode); "make check" works >> fine, for example. > Yo

Re: [HACKERS] XML regression test failure

2007-01-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Neil Conway wrote: > The regression.diffs are attached. Note that this reproduces > consistently, but only occurs if I use the "runtest" Makefile target > (i.e. run the regression tests in serial mode); "make check" works > fine, for example. You need to re-initdb. -- Peter Eisentraut http://deve