[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Rosenman) writes:
Gentlepeople,
Now that the patch is out for keeping the last
autovacuum/vacuum/analyze/autoanalyze
timestamp in the stats system is pending, what's the consensus view on
what, if any,
logging changes are wanted for autovacuum?
I have the
I don't know about anyone else, but the only time I look at that mess is
to find poor tuple/table or tuple/index ratios and other indications
that vacuum isn't working as well as it should be.
How about this instead:
Log when the actual autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor (dead space cleaned
up) was
Rod Taylor wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but the only time I look at that mess
is to find poor tuple/table or tuple/index ratios and other
indications that vacuum isn't working as well as it should be.
How about this instead:
Log when the actual autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 11:25 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Rod Taylor wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but the only time I look at that mess
is to find poor tuple/table or tuple/index ratios and other
indications that vacuum isn't working as well as it should be.
How about this
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:37:48PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 11:25 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Rod Taylor wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but the only time I look at that mess
is to find poor tuple/table or tuple/index ratios and other
indications that
