Re: [HACKERS] bit string functions

2007-07-16 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 09:40:18AM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote: I would like to make these a part of postgresql for others to use. Is it more appropriate for these to be in contrib code or part of the postgresql proper? How can I contribute these? I would say just set up a project on pgfoundry.

Re: [HACKERS] bit string functions

2007-07-16 Thread Gregory Stark
Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 09:40:18AM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote: I would like to make these a part of postgresql for others to use. Is it more appropriate for these to be in contrib code or part of the postgresql proper? How can I contribute these? I

Re: [HACKERS] bit string functions

2007-07-16 Thread Tom Lane
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would say just set up a project on pgfoundry. I agree, though I think in the long term we do need a more complete set of operators and functions in core. Considering that BIT and BIT VARYING have been

Re: [HACKERS] bit string functions

2007-07-16 Thread Gregory Stark
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would say just set up a project on pgfoundry. I agree, though I think in the long term we do need a more complete set of operators and functions in core. Considering