Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0

2006-08-08 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >> >>> Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Plus if it is backported, I can enable 8.x builds on mongoose (my x86 icc buildfarm box). >>> Please do --- I've applied the changes in 8.1 and

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0

2006-08-08 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Plus if it is backported, I can enable 8.x builds on mongoose (my x86 icc buildfarm box). Please do --- I've applied the changes in 8.1 and 8.0 branches. and leveret went green on both 8.

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0

2006-08-08 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: > Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Plus if it is backported, I can enable 8.x builds on mongoose (my x86 icc >> buildfarm box). > > Please do --- I've applied the changes in 8.1 and 8.0 branches. and leveret went green on both 8.0 and 8.1 ... Stefan

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0

2006-08-07 Thread Tom Lane
Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Plus if it is backported, I can enable 8.x builds on mongoose (my x86 icc > buildfarm box). Please do --- I've applied the changes in 8.1 and 8.0 branches. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0

2006-08-07 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Jeremy Drake wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> *) why the large difference in the build-flags ? >> CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't. >> I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of la

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0

2006-08-07 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > the just added new buildfarm member leveret (fedora core5 x86_64) is > building with the recently released Intel C-compiler version 9.1. > It passes all tests on -HEAD but fails on make check in both > REL8_1_STABLE and REL8_0_STABLE. > The logs of

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0

2006-08-07 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > *) why the large difference in the build-flags ? > > CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't. > I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of lack of testing, > but if w

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0

2006-08-07 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Jeremy Drake wrote: On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: *) why the large difference in the build-flags ? CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't. I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0

2006-08-07 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > *) why the large difference in the build-flags ? > > CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't. > I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of lack of testing, > but if w

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm - make check failures for leveret on 8.0 and 8.1

2006-08-07 Thread Tom Lane
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > *) why the large difference in the build-flags ? CVS HEAD configure.in knows about icc and the release branches don't. I think the changes were only put into HEAD because of lack of testing, but if we have buildfarm coverage I think it'd be OK to