On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2016-12-27 10:25, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>
>> Applied, thanks.
>>
>> Seems to me that in comments it's not worth chasing them down
>> individually,
>> but if you happen to fix on
On 2016-12-27 10:25, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
Applied, thanks.
Seems to me that in comments it's not worth chasing them down
individually,
but if you happen to fix one alongside another one like here, then it's
a
different story :)
Well,
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2016-12-25 13:38, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
>> 'the the' -> 'the'
>>
>> and
>>
>> 'ie' -> 'i.e.'
>>
>> Although (concening the latter change) the present counts are 'ie'
>> 428, and 'i.e.' 428.
>> so it might be debatable (but let's not)
>>
>>
On 2016-12-25 13:38, Erik Rijkers wrote:
'the the' -> 'the'
and
'ie' -> 'i.e.'
Although (concening the latter change) the present counts are 'ie'
428, and 'i.e.' 428.
so it might be debatable (but let's not)
Sorry; I meant: 'ie' 428, and 'i.e.' 305.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing li