On tis, 2011-12-06 at 15:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
TBH, I think that inventing a new datestyle setting ECMA would be a
more appropriate investment of effort.
So we'd have a setting called ECMA that's really ISO, and a setting
called ISO that's really SQL, and a setting called SQL that's really
On Dec 7, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tis, 2011-12-06 at 15:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
TBH, I think that inventing a new datestyle setting ECMA would be a
more appropriate investment of effort.
So we'd have a setting called ECMA that's really ISO, and a setting
called ISO
2011/12/7 ben hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com:
On Dec 7, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tis, 2011-12-06 at 15:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
TBH, I think that inventing a new datestyle setting ECMA would be a
more appropriate investment of effort.
So we'd have a setting called
i know its been over a year without any activity on this thread but did
anything ever come of this? i'd really like to be able to get dates to
match the format specified for date time strings in ecmascript 5. a
generic way to specify the format would be ideal if it can be done
securely. has
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Ben Hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com wrote:
i know its been over a year without any activity on this thread but did
anything ever come of this? i'd really like to be able to get dates to
match the format specified for date time strings in ecmascript 5. a generic
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Ben Hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com wrote:
i know its been over a year without any activity on this thread but did
anything ever come of this? i'd really like to be able to get dates to
match the format specified for date
2011/12/6 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Ben Hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com wrote:
i know its been over a year without any activity on this thread but did
anything ever come of this? i'd really like to be able to get dates
On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am for ECMA datestyle
it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on second hand - the
usage of this feature is
2011/12/6 ben hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com:
On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am for ECMA datestyle
it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on
2011/12/6 ben hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com:
On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am for ECMA datestyle
it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on
On 12/6/2011 3:53 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am not sure, if this patch is 100% correct
but it does something
the name is not ECMA but XSD - I hope, so both formats are same
that format works for me. in fact a simple test to see if it would do
what i hope for would be to open the
2011/12/6 ben hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com:
On 12/6/2011 3:53 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am not sure, if this patch is 100% correct
but it does something
the name is not ECMA but XSD - I hope, so both formats are same
that format works for me. in fact a simple test to see if it would
On 12/6/2011 4:19 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
it can be in 9.2 (if will be accepted) - it will be release at summer 2012
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
Regards
Pavel Stehule
ok, so i assume your patch is now considered submitted and is waiting
to be reviewed. i'll wait
2011/12/6 ben hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com:
On 12/6/2011 4:19 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
it can be in 9.2 (if will be accepted) - it will be release at summer 2012
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
Regards
Pavel Stehule
ok, so i assume your patch is now considered
i may have spoken a little too soon about the format being right... i
just took a look at the postgres source code and it would need one more
change to completely meet my needs. EncodeDateTime should put a 'Z' for
UTC timezone rather than '+0'. with this being the case, do you think
there
Hello
2011/12/6 ben hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com:
i may have spoken a little too soon about the format being right... i just
took a look at the postgres source code and it would need one more change to
completely meet my needs. EncodeDateTime should put a 'Z' for UTC timezone
rather than
On May 19, 2010, at 4:31 AM, Mike Fowler wrote:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/5/19 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Ben Hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for looking into adding this feature. custom formats for parsing and
formatting of dates would certainly be the better option if it can be done
securely.
Well, Pavel expressed a concern about SQL injection, but I
On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
interoperability with JavaScript applications would be highly
desirable.
Note that we haven't got any other datestyles
2010/5/19 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
interoperability with JavaScript applications would be highly
desirable.
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/5/19 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
interoperability with JavaScript applications
2010/5/19 Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/5/19 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
Pavel Stehule wrote:
see google: lateral sql injection oracle NLS_DATE_FORMAT
I would to like this functionality too - and technically I don't see a
problem - It's less than 100 lines, but I don't need a new security
problem. So my proposal is change nothing on this integrated
functionality and
2010/5/19 Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
see google: lateral sql injection oracle NLS_DATE_FORMAT
I would to like this functionality too - and technically I don't see a
problem - It's less than 100 lines, but I don't need a new security
problem. So my proposal is change
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/5/19 Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
see google: lateral sql injection oracle NLS_DATE_FORMAT
I would to like this functionality too - and technically I don't see a
problem - It's less than 100 lines, but I don't need a new security
2010/5/19 Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
2010/5/19 Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
see google: lateral sql injection oracle NLS_DATE_FORMAT
I would to like this functionality too - and technically I don't see a
problem - It's less than 100
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ben Hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i mistakenly had posted this to pgsql-bugs already and got a response (see
below - edited). i'm posting here since afaik it is the way i should be
requesting new features. my suggestion is to add a DATESTYLE format
2010/5/19 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ben Hockey neonstalw...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i mistakenly had posted this to pgsql-bugs already and got a response (see
below - edited). i'm posting here since afaik it is the way i should be
requesting new
28 matches
Mail list logo
