Barry Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Below is the current behavior (based on a fresh pull from cvs this morning):
Current State ActionEnd State
ACon and NITset ACon ACon and NIT
set ACoff ACoff and IT*
I said:
Bruce was supposed to fix this. We agreed that a SET command would
never initiate a transaction block on its own. Looks like it's not
there yet ---
Now it is. Give it another try ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of
Tom Lane wrote:
Barry Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Below is the current behavior (based on a fresh pull from cvs this morning):
Current State ActionEnd State
ACon and NITset ACon ACon and NIT
set ACoff
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I thought I did it, and it did work on my limited number of test
cases. Seems you got it fully working.
Actually, it failed for me (and evidently for Barry) on exactly the test
case you posted along with the patch. You said
test= set autocommit
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I thought I did it, and it did work on my limited number of test
cases. Seems you got it fully working.
Actually, it failed for me (and evidently for Barry) on exactly the test
case you posted along with the patch. You said
