On 24.8.2014 18:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra writes:
>> Regarding those leaks we've detected so far - is it the kind of leaks
>> that can happen only in testing with those specific flags, or is it
>> something that can happen in production too? (Assuming no one is running
>> with CLOBBER_CAC
Tomas Vondra writes:
> Regarding those leaks we've detected so far - is it the kind of leaks
> that can happen only in testing with those specific flags, or is it
> something that can happen in production too? (Assuming no one is running
> with CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY in production, of course ;-
On 24.8.2014 18:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra writes:
>>> I stopped the already running test on addax and started the test on
>>> barnacle again. Let's see in a few days/weeks/months what is the result.
>
>> It seems to be running much faster (probably after removing the
>> randomization), a
Tomas Vondra writes:
>> I stopped the already running test on addax and started the test on
>> barnacle again. Let's see in a few days/weeks/months what is the result.
> It seems to be running much faster (probably after removing the
> randomization), and apparently it passed the create_view test
Hi,
On 13.8.2014 19:17, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 13.8.2014 17:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> * I'm a bit dubious about testing -DRANDOMIZE_ALLOCATED_MEMORY in the
>> same build as -DCLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY, because each of these is
>> darned expensive and it's not clear you'd learn anything by running
On 13.8.2014 17:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Tomas Vondra" writes:
>> So after 83 days, the regression tests on barnacle completed, and it
>> smells like another memory leak in CacheMemoryContext, similar to those
>> fixed in 078b2ed on May 18.
>
> I've pushed fixes for the issues I was able to identif
"Tomas Vondra" writes:
> So after 83 days, the regression tests on barnacle completed, and it
> smells like another memory leak in CacheMemoryContext, similar to those
> fixed in 078b2ed on May 18.
I've pushed fixes for the issues I was able to identify by running the
create_view test. I definit
I wrote:
> "Tomas Vondra" writes:
>> So after 83 days, the regression tests on barnacle completed,
> Hah, that's perseverance!
>> and it
>> smells like another memory leak in CacheMemoryContext, similar to those
>> fixed in 078b2ed on May 18.
> Ugh, will look.
I've been experimenting by runnin
On 12.8.2014 02:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Evidently the OOM killer is at large on this machine.
Yes. It's a machine with only 8GB of RAM, and there are 3 VMs (LXC
containers), with 2GB of RAM each. That's not much, but while it's
mostly out of necessity, it's apparently a good way to catch leaks.
T
"Tomas Vondra" writes:
> So after 83 days, the regression tests on barnacle completed,
Hah, that's perseverance!
> and it
> smells like another memory leak in CacheMemoryContext, similar to those
> fixed in 078b2ed on May 18.
Ugh, will look.
> See this:
> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_lo
10 matches
Mail list logo
