Re: [HACKERS] fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr

2017-05-17 Thread Amit Langote
On 2017/05/18 3:43, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
>  wrote:
>> While browsing through the partitioning code, I noticed that a recent commit
>> f8bffe9e6d700fd34759a92e47930ce9ba7dcbd5, which fixes multi-column range
>> partitioning constraints, introduced a function make_partition_op_expr, that
>> takes keynum as a input parameter to identify the index of the partition
>> key.
>> In case of range partition we can have multiple partition keys but for list
>> partition we have only one. Considering that, I think following code does
>> not
>> cause any side-effect logically(and may be a oversight while moving the code
>> from function get_qual_for_list to this function):
>>
>> saopexpr->inputcollid = key->partcollation[0];
>> saopexpr->args = list_make2(arg1, arg2);
>>
>> But as we have keynum now, should we be using it to index
>> key->partcollation,
>> instead of a hard coded '0'.
> 
> Agreed.  Committed your patch.

Me too, thanks both.

Regards,
Amit



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr

2017-05-17 Thread Jeevan Ladhe
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Robert Haas  wrote:
>
> Agreed.  Committed your patch.
>

 Thanks Robert!


Re: [HACKERS] fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr

2017-05-17 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
 wrote:
> While browsing through the partitioning code, I noticed that a recent commit
> f8bffe9e6d700fd34759a92e47930ce9ba7dcbd5, which fixes multi-column range
> partitioning constraints, introduced a function make_partition_op_expr, that
> takes keynum as a input parameter to identify the index of the partition
> key.
> In case of range partition we can have multiple partition keys but for list
> partition we have only one. Considering that, I think following code does
> not
> cause any side-effect logically(and may be a oversight while moving the code
> from function get_qual_for_list to this function):
>
> saopexpr->inputcollid = key->partcollation[0];
> saopexpr->args = list_make2(arg1, arg2);
>
> But as we have keynum now, should we be using it to index
> key->partcollation,
> instead of a hard coded '0'.

Agreed.  Committed your patch.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers