On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 17:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Well, yes. But then to stop that you could just lock users out using
pg_hba.conf, no? It just doesn't seem to be buying all that much to me.
The main reason to turn it off is to disable a whole
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan
andrew.duns...@pgexperts.com wrote:
The docs don't seem to contain any discussion I could find on why one might
not want hot_standby on. Maybe it's just too obvious to most people, but
this seems to be a bit lacking in the docs.
Well, if you
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan
andrew.duns...@pgexperts.com wrote:
The docs don't seem to contain any discussion I could find on why one might
not want hot_standby on. Maybe it's just too obvious to most people, but
this seems to be a bit lacking in the
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan
andrew.duns...@pgexperts.com wrote:
The docs don't seem to contain any discussion I could find on why one
might
not want hot_standby on. Maybe it's
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Well, yes. But then to stop that you could just lock users out using
pg_hba.conf, no? It just doesn't seem to be buying all that much to me.
The main reason to turn it off is to disable a whole lot of very poorly
tested code, and thereby improve the
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Well, yes. But then to stop that you could just lock users out using
pg_hba.conf, no? It just doesn't seem to be buying all that much to me.
The main reason to turn it off is to disable a whole lot of very poorly
tested
