"Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I still think int8mul is buggy. It calculates result as arg1 * arg2, and then
> checks for an overflow by dividing again, and seeing if the right answer
> comes out. Which sounds good. But it *skips* that check if both arguments
> fit into an int32 -
Tom Lane wrote:
"Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm confused about whether int8s work on a machine on which
INT64_IS_BUSTED. My reading of the code suggests that int8
will be available, but be, well, busted in such a machine.
The datatype exists, but it's really only int32.
Fo
"Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm confused about whether int8s work on a machine on which
> INT64_IS_BUSTED. My reading of the code suggests that int8
> will be available, but be, well, busted in such a machine.
The datatype exists, but it's really only int32.
> For example, in
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 22:41 +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Or are platforms with INT64_IS_BUSTED no longer supported,
> and are all those #ifdefs only legacy code?
Personally I think we should head in that direction: if we enable
integer datetimes by default in 8.4 (per earlier discussion), such
