Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I really don't get the libedit-preferred syntax? Why not just:
--with-libedituse BSD Libedit not GNU Readline
--with-readline use GNU Readline not BSD Libedit
--without-readline do not use GNU Readline nor BSD Libedit
Well, the point is that
Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I really don't get the libedit-preferred syntax? Why not just:
--with-libedit use BSD Libedit not GNU Readline
--with-readline use GNU Readline not BSD Libedit
--without-readline do not use GNU Readline nor BSD Libedit
Well,
Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD
On what platform, and with what version of libedit? I built HEAD just
yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with Apple's libedit.
we have (a bit of) buildfarm
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD
On what platform, and with what version of libedit? I built HEAD just
yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with Apple's libedit.
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the switches are confusing ... when you are using libedit, you
certainly don't want readline as well, so it seems natural to disable
it. I understand that what --without-readline really does is turn the
line-editing capability off in general
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the switches are confusing ... when you are using libedit, you
certainly don't want readline as well, so it seems natural to disable
it. I understand that what --without-readline really does is turn the
line-editing capability
