Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-08 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Bruce Momjian wrote: I just made some major Win32 modifications in the past few days. Would you try Cygwin compile and see if the following warnings are removed and the rest of the system builds OK? Now that postgres 8.0 is win32 native is it still necessary support the cygwin ? Regards Gaetano

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-08 Thread Reini Urban
Gaetano Mendola schrieb: Bruce Momjian wrote: I just made some major Win32 modifications in the past few days. Would you try Cygwin compile and see if the following warnings are removed and the rest of the system builds OK? Now that postgres 8.0 is win32 native is it still necessary support the

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Reini Urban wrote: Gaetano Mendola schrieb: Bruce Momjian wrote: I just made some major Win32 modifications in the past few days. Would you try Cygwin compile and see if the following warnings are removed and the rest of the system builds OK? Now that postgres 8.0 is win32 native is

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-08 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reini Urban wrote: Now that postgres 8.0 is win32 native is it still necessary support the cygwin ? FYI: If you drop it I will still provide cygwin packages. I just need it for testing and writing applications targetted to unix. With win32 this is

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
I just made some major Win32 modifications in the past few days. Would you try Cygwin compile and see if the following warnings are removed and the rest of the system builds OK? --- Reini Urban wrote: [BTW: there's no