Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> writes:
> I happened to notice a bit of an inconsistency in the way initdb
> probes max_connections and shared_buffers.
> This line in the shared_buffers test:
> /* Use same amount of memory, independent of BLCKSZ */
> test_buffs = (trial_bufs[i] * 8192) / BLCKSZ;
> has no equivalent in the max_connections test. As a result
> max_connections is tested with 10 buffers per connection regardless of
> BLCKSZ.
> Is this intentional? Is the idea that Postgres can't function properly
> without being able to read from 10 files concurrently regardless of
> block size? Or is it an unintentional holdover from before the line
> above was added for the shared_buffers tests?
I think it's intentional; the minimum number of buffers needed per
session doesn't really vary with BLCKSZ, but rather with code structure
(ie, how many buffer pins a query might take at once). Still, some
comments documenting that a little better wouldn't be a bad thing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
