On 2017-04-06 13:43:55 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-04-06 10:00:32 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > > Sure I can do that, In attached patch, I only fixed the problem of not
> > > executing the bitmap test. Now, I
On 2017-04-06 10:00:32 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > Sure I can do that, In attached patch, I only fixed the problem of not
> > executing the bitmap test. Now, I will add few cases to cover other
> > parts especially
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Sure I can do that, In attached patch, I only fixed the problem of not
> executing the bitmap test. Now, I will add few cases to cover other
> parts especially rescan and prefetching logic.
I have added two test cases
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> That's better than before, but I'd appreciate working on a bit more
> coverage. E.g. rescans probably aren't exercised in that test, right?
>
> If you have time & energy, it'd also be good to expand the tests to
> cover
On 2017-04-01 17:23:04 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The parallel code-path isn't actually exercised in the tests added in
> > [1], as evidenced by [2] (they just explain). That imo needs to be
> > fixed.
>
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The parallel code-path isn't actually exercised in the tests added in
> [1], as evidenced by [2] (they just explain). That imo needs to be
> fixed.
Thanks for reporting. Attached patch fixes that.
--
Regards,