On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I found so this extremely simple patch should be useful.
It helps for pattern SELECT fx();
There was thread about it.
Hi Pavel,
I signed up to be reviewer for this patch, and finally got around to
taking a
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
I'm rather of the contrary opinion -- surely if we're going to complete
function names, we should only complete those that are in schemas in the
path; similarly for column names.
I think it makes sense to only
On mån, 2012-03-19 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
This connects somewhat to the discussions we've had in the past about
trying to get not-intended-for-public-use functions out of the
standard search path. Not that you want to put a full visibility
check into the tab-completion query, but if
On fre, 2012-03-16 at 13:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm a bit concerned about whether that's actually going to be useful.
A quick check shows that in the regression database, the proposed patch
produces 3246 possible completions, which suggests that by the time you
get down to a unique match
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On fre, 2012-03-16 at 13:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm a bit concerned about whether that's actually going to be useful.
A quick check shows that in the regression database, the proposed patch
produces 3246 possible completions, which suggests that by
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 19 16:53:49 -0300 2012:
This connects somewhat to the discussions we've had in the past about
trying to get not-intended-for-public-use functions out of the standard
search path. Not that you want to put a full visibility check into the
On tor, 2012-03-15 at 16:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue mar 15 16:25:53 -0300 2012:
On sön, 2012-02-19 at 20:10 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I found so this extremely simple patch should be useful.
It helps for pattern SELECT fx();
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tor, 2012-03-15 at 16:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue mar 15 16:25:53 -0300 2012:
Isn't that just a subset of what I had proposed?
On sön, 2012-02-19 at 20:10 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I found so this extremely simple patch should be useful.
It helps for pattern SELECT fx();
Isn't that just a subset of what I had proposed?
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1328820579.11241.4.ca...@vanquo.pezone.net
There was
2012/3/15 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
On sön, 2012-02-19 at 20:10 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I found so this extremely simple patch should be useful.
It helps for pattern SELECT fx();
Isn't that just a subset of what I had proposed?
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue mar 15 16:25:53 -0300 2012:
On sön, 2012-02-19 at 20:10 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I found so this extremely simple patch should be useful.
It helps for pattern SELECT fx();
Isn't that just a subset of what I had proposed?
11 matches
Mail list logo
