Zdenek Kotala napsal(a):
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:26:19AM +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
5) Tuples
question: Does have data types some disk representation?
Does have tupleheader same structure?
I think only the inet/cidr types changed format
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:49:05AM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
8) WAL/XLOG
Question: Should be deleted?
I imagine you should probably force a checkpoint and then wipe the wal
records. The WAL isn't going to be able to cover some of the stuff done
during the upgrade, so it'd
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:49:05AM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
8) WAL/XLOG
Question: Should be deleted?
I imagine you should probably force a checkpoint and then wipe the wal
records. The WAL isn't going to be able to cover some of the stuff done
during the
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:26:19AM +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
snip
1) BKI - catalog.
c) Some records are changed
action: ???
They just need to be changed. In principle the datalog needs to be
updated so it looks like a database initdb'd with the new version.
5) Tuples
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:26:19AM +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
snip
1) BKI - catalog.
c) Some records are changed
action: ???
They just need to be changed. In principle the datalog needs to be
updated so it looks like a database initdb'd with the new
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:26:19AM +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
snip
1) BKI - catalog.
c) Some records are changed
action: ???
They just need to be changed. In principle the datalog needs to be
updated so it looks like a
