Re: [HACKERS] pl/python tracebacks v2

2011-04-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 23:54 +0200, Jan Urbański wrote: Ouch, just today I found a flaw in this, namely that it assumes the lineno from the traceback always refers to the PL/Python function. If you create a PL/Python function that imports some code, runs it, and that code raises an

Re: [HACKERS] pl/python tracebacks v2

2011-04-06 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On mån, 2011-03-21 at 00:40 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote: I finally got around to updating the PL/Python tracebacks patch. The other day I was writing some very simple PL/Python code and the lack of tracebacks is extremely annoying. I tweaked this a bit to make the patch less invasive, and then

Re: [HACKERS] pl/python tracebacks v2

2011-04-06 Thread Jan Urbański
On 06/04/11 21:38, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On mån, 2011-03-21 at 00:40 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote: I finally got around to updating the PL/Python tracebacks patch. The other day I was writing some very simple PL/Python code and the lack of tracebacks is extremely annoying. I tweaked this a

Re: [HACKERS] pl/python tracebacks v2

2011-04-06 Thread Jan Urbański
On 06/04/11 22:16, Jan Urbański wrote: On 06/04/11 21:38, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On mån, 2011-03-21 at 00:40 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote: I finally got around to updating the PL/Python tracebacks patch. The other day I was writing some very simple PL/Python code and the lack of tracebacks is

Re: [HACKERS] pl/python tracebacks v2

2011-03-20 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On 20 March 2011 23:40, Jan Urbański wulc...@wulczer.org wrote: I'll update the commitfest app for the 2011-Next commitfest, but if someone would like to pick this up and include it in the 9.1 PL/Python revamp pack, I'd be thrilled. I would also be thrilled. I definitely share your sense of