On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 02:01:25PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:55:14PM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
> > >Well, it'd be nice to allow substitution there ...
> > >
> > >>What we can't easily do is to allow quotes to prevent variable
> > >>substitution in these whole-line
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:55:14PM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
> >Well, it'd be nice to allow substitution there ...
> >
> >>What we can't easily do is to allow quotes to prevent variable
> >>substitution in these whole-line commands because we can't process the
> >>quotes because that will remove
On 17/08/12 18:38, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 05:31:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I'm not sure whether that's a bug per se, but I can see where a
behavior change might be an improvement.
I did some research on this and learned a little more about flex rul
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 05:31:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether that's a bug per se, but I can see where a
>> behavior change might be an improvement.
> I did some research on this and learned a little more about flex rules.
> Turns out we can allow v
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 05:31:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
> > It looks like \copy is just passing the text of the query unadjusted to
> > "COPY". I get a syntax error on ":x" with the \copy below on both 9.0 and
> > 9.1
> >
> > === test s
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
> It looks like \copy is just passing the text of the query unadjusted to
> "COPY". I get a syntax error on ":x" with the \copy below on both 9.0 and
> 9.1
>
> === test script ===
> \set x '''HELLO'''
> -- Works
> \echo :x
> -- Works
> \o '/tm