Re: [HACKERS] recovery consistent != hot standby

2010-05-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT -> PM_HOT_STANDBY >> PMSIGNAL_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT -> PMSIGNAL_BEGIN_HOT_STANDBY > > +1.  From the point of view of the postmaster, whether the state > transition happens immediately upon reaching cons

Re: [HACKERS] recovery consistent != hot standby

2010-05-14 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT -> PM_HOT_STANDBY > PMSIGNAL_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT -> PMSIGNAL_BEGIN_HOT_STANDBY +1. From the point of view of the postmaster, whether the state transition happens immediately upon reaching consistency, or at a later time, or perhaps even earlier (if we