Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hm, I just had regression tests pass earlier this evening on RHL 8.0
>>> (also HPUX 10.20). Are you using default config, or
>>> --enable-integer-datetimes?
>
>> I'm u
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 03:09:13AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Mph. It fails for me too when I use --enable-integer-datetimes. Looks
> like that patch still needs some work...
Yeah. I'm really, really, *really* sorry for submitting it in the state
it was in. I shouldn't have done that just bef
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm seeing a regression failure on the horology test on two different
> machines. I'd venture a guess that it is related to this change:
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2003-02/msg00166.php
It seems to be a problem with signed vs unsig
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, I just had regression tests pass earlier this evening on RHL 8.0
>> (also HPUX 10.20). Are you using default config, or
>> --enable-integer-datetimes?
> I'm using --enable-integer-datetimes on both.
Mph. It fails for me too when I
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sorry -- one is Red Hat 8.0/Intel P3 and one is Red Hat 7.3/AMD Athlon.
Hm, I just had regression tests pass earlier this evening on RHL 8.0
(also HPUX 10.20). Are you using default config, or
--enable-integer-datetimes?
I'm using --enable-i
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry -- one is Red Hat 8.0/Intel P3 and one is Red Hat 7.3/AMD Athlon.
Hm, I just had regression tests pass earlier this evening on RHL 8.0
(also HPUX 10.20). Are you using default config, or
--enable-integer-datetimes?
regards,
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm seeing a regression failure on the horology test on two different
machines.
Uh ... what machines, and what failure exactly?
Sorry -- one is Red Hat 8.0/Intel P3 and one is Red Hat 7.3/AMD Athlon.
Regression diff attached.
Joe
*** ./expe
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm seeing a regression failure on the horology test on two different
> machines.
Uh ... what machines, and what failure exactly?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Ha
