On 22 August 2016 at 10:31, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Craig Ringer
> wrote:
> > On 21 Aug 2016 12:36 AM, "Bruce Momjian" wrote:
> >> Seems like another good idea to use pg_basebackup rather than manually
> >> doing base backups; Magnus has been saying this for a
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 01:43:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Note as well that pg_basebackup omits its content and creates an empty
>> directory.
>
> Are there any other error-prone things copied from the master?
The contents of pg_sn
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Craig Ringer
wrote:
> On 21 Aug 2016 12:36 AM, "Bruce Momjian" wrote:
>> Seems like another good idea to use pg_basebackup rather than manually
>> doing base backups; Magnus has been saying this for a while.
>
> The main time that's an issue is when you're rsync'
On 21 Aug 2016 12:36 AM, "Bruce Momjian" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 01:43:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Someone reported that a replication slot that existed at the time a
base
> > > backup was done on the master was cop
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 01:43:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Someone reported that a replication slot that existed at the time a base
> > backup was done on the master was copied to the standby. Because they
> > didn't realize it, th
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Someone reported that a replication slot that existed at the time a base
> backup was done on the master was copied to the standby. Because they
> didn't realize it, their WAL was not being recycled on the standby.
>
> Is that possible? Is
