Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread Robert Haas
2010/12/12 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com: I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed to the current v9.1 development cycle. It seems to me that the next commit after the label-switcher-function patch ought to be a contrib module that implements a basic form of SE-Linux

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread KaiGai Kohei
(2010/12/13 21:53), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/12 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed to the current v9.1 development cycle. It seems to me that the next commit after the label-switcher-function patch ought to be a contrib module that

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:32 AM, KaiGai Kohei kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote: (2010/12/13 21:53), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/12 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed to the current v9.1 development cycle. It seems to me that the next

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread KaiGai Kohei
(2010/12/14 1:03), Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:32 AM, KaiGai Koheikai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote: (2010/12/13 21:53), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/12 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed to the current v9.1 development

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread Robert Haas
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com: It is a good news for me also, because I didn't imagine SE-PostgreSQL module getting upstreamed, even if contrib module. OK, I'll focus on the works to merge the starter-version of SE-PostgreSQL as a contrib module in the last commit fest.

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread KaiGai Kohei
(2010/12/14 9:32), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: It is a good news for me also, because I didn't imagine SE-PostgreSQL module getting upstreamed, even if contrib module. OK, I'll focus on the works to merge the starter-version of SE-PostgreSQL as a contrib

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread Robert Haas
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com: I counted number of lines of the sepgsql module that implement only currently supported hooks. It has 3.2KL of code not. Uh, wow.  That's rather surprising.  I thought that it would be measured in hundreds of lines.  Aren't the hooks that we

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread KaiGai Kohei
(2010/12/14 10:41), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: I counted number of lines of the sepgsql module that implement only currently supported hooks. It has 3.2KL of code not. Uh, wow. That's rather surprising. I thought that it would be measured in hundreds of

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread Robert Haas
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com: The starter version is not intended to use in production system, Well, what's the point, then? I thought we had enough infrastructure in place at this point to build a simple system that, while it wouldn't meet every use case, would be useful to

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread KaiGai Kohei
(2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: The starter version is not intended to use in production system, Well, what's the point, then? I thought we had enough infrastructure in place at this point to build a simple system that, while it wouldn't

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread Robert Haas
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com: (2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: The starter version is not intended to use in production system, Well, what's the point, then?  I thought we had enough infrastructure in place at this point to

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread KaiGai Kohei
(2010/12/14 12:53), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: (2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: The starter version is not intended to use in production system, Well, what's the point, then? I thought we had enough

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread Robert Haas
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com: (2010/12/14 12:53), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: (2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: The starter version is not intended to use in production system, Well, what's

Re: [HACKERS] rest of works for security providers in v9.1

2010-12-13 Thread KaiGai Kohei
(2010/12/14 13:31), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: (2010/12/14 12:53), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: (2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote: 2010/12/13 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com: The starter version is not intended to