On ons, 2012-01-18 at 21:21 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On lör, 2012-01-07 at 16:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
I suggest that we change PostgresMain(), PostmasterMain(), BackendRun(),
WalSenderMain(), and WalSndLoop() to return void as well.
I
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2012-01-18 at 21:21 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On lör, 2012-01-07 at 16:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
I suggest that we change PostgresMain(), PostmasterMain(),
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2012-01-18 at 21:21 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On lör, 2012-01-07 at 16:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
I suggest that we change PostgresMain(), PostmasterMain(),
On lör, 2012-01-07 at 16:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
I suggest that we change PostgresMain(), PostmasterMain(), BackendRun(),
WalSenderMain(), and WalSndLoop() to return void as well.
I agree this code is not very consistent or useful, but one
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
I suggest that we change PostgresMain(), PostmasterMain(), BackendRun(),
WalSenderMain(), and WalSndLoop() to return void as well.
I agree this code is not very consistent or useful, but one question:
what should the callers do if one of these functions
