Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> SQL/PSM default for SQL procedures are SECURITY DEFINER (like views),
>
> I can't find this in the standard. Where did you get this
> information?
I only have a draft version of SQL:2003, which says in the 'Foundation'
book, chapter 11.50 (""), about the ""
(which can
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SQL/PSM default for SQL procedures are SECURITY DEFINER (like views),
but
> PostgreSQL default is SECURITY CALLLER. Is acceptable to define security
> flag in dependency to used language?
I'd vote no, even if Peter is wrong and you're right about w
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> SQL/PSM default for SQL procedures are SECURITY DEFINER (like views),
I can't find this in the standard. Where did you get this information?
--
Jim Melton, SQL's stored procedures, page 43,
next:
blom98sqlpsm:
3.3.1 Access rights to data
By default, the stored routin
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SQL/PSM default for SQL procedures are SECURITY DEFINER (like views), but
> PostgreSQL default is SECURITY CALLLER. Is acceptable to define security
> flag in dependency to used language?
I'd vote no, even if Peter is wrong and you're right about wha
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> SQL/PSM default for SQL procedures are SECURITY DEFINER (like views),
I can't find this in the standard. Where did you get this information?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(end of broadcast)
