Re: [HACKERS] segfault in 9.5alpha - plpgsql function, implicit cast and IMMUTABLE cast function

2015-07-18 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Geoff Winkless pgsqlad...@geoff.dj writes: While doing some testing of 9.5a one of my colleagues (not on list) found a reproducible server segfault. Hm, looks like commit 1345cc67bbb014209714af32b5681b1e11eaf964 is to

Re: [HACKERS] segfault in 9.5alpha - plpgsql function, implicit cast and IMMUTABLE cast function

2015-07-17 Thread Tom Lane
Geoff Winkless pgsqlad...@geoff.dj writes: While doing some testing of 9.5a one of my colleagues (not on list) found a reproducible server segfault. Hm, looks like commit 1345cc67bbb014209714af32b5681b1e11eaf964 is to blame: memory management for the plpgsql cast cache needs to be more

Re: [HACKERS] segfault in 9.5alpha - plpgsql function, implicit cast and IMMUTABLE cast function

2015-07-17 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Geoff Winkless pgsqlad...@geoff.dj wrote: While doing some testing of 9.5a one of my colleagues (not on list) found a reproducible server segfault. [...] Hope someone can get something useful from the above. Any questions, please ask. A test case is more than