Re: [HACKERS] skink's test_decoding failures in 9.4 branch

Andres Freund writes: > I guess either using valgrind's gdb server on error, or putting some > asserts checking the size would be best. I can look into it, but it'll > not be today likely. I believe the problem is that DecodeUpdate is not on the same page as the WAL-writing

Re: [HACKERS] skink's test_decoding failures in 9.4 branch

Hi, On 2016-07-20 12:45:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > I've still had no luck reproducing it here, though. Same here so far. > Hah --- I take that back. On about the fourth or fifth trial: Interesting. > ==00:00:00:34.291 21525== Invalid read of size 1 > ==00:00:00:34.291 21525==

Re: [HACKERS] skink's test_decoding failures in 9.4 branch

I wrote: > I've still had no luck reproducing it here, though. Hah --- I take that back. On about the fourth or fifth trial: ==00:00:00:34.291 21525== Invalid read of size 1 ==00:00:00:34.291 21525==at 0x4A08DEC: memcpy (mc_replace_strmem.c:882) ==00:00:00:34.291 21525==by 0x66FA54: