Re: [HACKERS] standby_schedule

2016-03-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Simon Riggs wrote: > On 29 March 2016 at 22:44, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > I think we're at a point where we can translate the tests in > > src/test/regress/standby_schedule file into a PostgresNode-based test, > > or remove it (probably under src/test/recovery). That

Re: [HACKERS] standby_schedule

2016-03-30 Thread Simon Riggs
On 29 March 2016 at 22:44, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I think we're at a point where we can translate the tests in > src/test/regress/standby_schedule file into a PostgresNode-based test, > or remove it (probably under src/test/recovery). That way, it would get > run all

Re: [HACKERS] standby_schedule

2016-03-29 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I think we're at a point where we can translate the tests in > src/test/regress/standby_schedule file into a PostgresNode-based test, > or remove it (probably under src/test/recovery). That way, it would get > run