Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit = remote_flush

2016-08-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: >> I'm wondering if we've hit the point where trying to put all of this in a >> single GUC is a bad idea... changing that probably

Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit = remote_flush

2016-08-21 Thread Thomas Munro
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: > I'm wondering if we've hit the point where trying to put all of this in a > single GUC is a bad idea... changing that probably means a config > compatibility break, but I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing at >

Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit = remote_flush

2016-08-21 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Thomas Munro 2016-08-21

Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit = remote_flush

2016-08-21 Thread Thomas Munro
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Munro >> wrote: >>> To do something about the confusion I keep

Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit = remote_flush

2016-08-19 Thread Masahiko Sawada
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Munro > wrote: >> To do something about the confusion I keep seeing about what exactly >> "on" means, I've often wished we had "remote_flush". But

Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit = remote_flush

2016-08-18 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Munro wrote: > To do something about the confusion I keep seeing about what exactly > "on" means, I've often wished we had "remote_flush". But it's not > obvious how the backwards compatibility could work, ie how to keep the

Re: [HACKERS] synchronous_commit = remote_flush

2016-08-18 Thread Jim Nasby
On 8/17/16 11:22 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: Hi hackers, To do something about the confusion I keep seeing about what exactly "on" means, I've often wished we had "remote_flush". But it's not obvious how the backwards compatibility could work, ie how to keep the people happy who use "local" vs