On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 06:22:49PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:29:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > For backwards compatibility we should probably say that this
> > automatic lifting of base-table defaults happens only if the
> > INSERT rule is implicitly generated ... if
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:29:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> For backwards compatibility we should probably say that this automatic
> lifting of base-table defaults happens only if the INSERT rule is
> implicitly generated ... if you write a manual INSERT rule you need
> manual defaults too. Or sho
"Jaime Casanova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now that you're reviewing the updatable view patch, i think we must
> decide what you're position will be about if the updatable view should
> inherit the base table default values... or if we want to create
> default values for every view if we want t
