Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-27 Thread Aakash Goel
Sure Kevin, will get the wiki page ready asap, and reply back. Thanks. On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote: [resending because of postgresql.org bounces on first try] Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Kevin Grittner

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-27 Thread Aakash Goel
All, the wiki page is now up at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/XReader. On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Aakash Goel aakash.b...@gmail.com wrote: Sure Kevin, will get the wiki page ready asap, and reply back. Thanks. On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Grittner

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort

2012-04-27 Thread Greg Smith
On 04/26/2012 12:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote: I don't recall seeing any previous postings about the 2Q project, either. We should try to keep these discussions on-list. First brought up two months ago to the list it seemed most relevant to at the time:

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort

2012-04-27 Thread Kevin Grittner
Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On 04/26/2012 12:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote: I don't recall seeing any previous postings about the 2Q project, either. We should try to keep these discussions on-list. First brought up two months ago to the list it seemed most relevant to at the time:

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort

2012-04-27 Thread Greg Smith
On 04/27/2012 06:48 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: That's largely my fault. It may not have come out that way, but I was trying more to point out the complexity of the story rather than assign blame. I find it hard to point at any obvious don't do that again target here. -- Greg Smith

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-26 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote: [resending because of postgresql.org bounces on first try] Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote: The GSoC xReader project is intended to be a major step

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-26 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote: [resending because of postgresql.org bounces on first try] Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Kevin Grittner

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-26 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote: [resending because of postgresql.org bounces on first try]

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort

2012-04-26 Thread Josh Berkus
The GSoC xReader project is intended to be a major step toward that, by providing a way to translate the WAL stream to a series of notifications of logical events to clients which register with xReader. sigh Yes, it appears very similar. I didn't know about this. This isn't a problem. In