Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Add function for quote_qualified_identifier?
Brendan Jurd wrote: On 9/29/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we need more than one person's request to add this function. Well, I don't expect it would get requested. Most DBAs would likely look for the function in the docs, see it's not there and then just implement it themselves. Obviously it's not critical. But anticipating those little requirements and providing for them is one of the things that makes a piece of software a pleasure to use. Batteries included and all that. I was just looking for someone else to say Yea, I would like that too. Anyway, I seem to be flogging a horse which, if not dead, is surely mortally wounded. If quote_qualified_ident isn't desired, perhaps you can still use the regression test I included for quote_ident in the patch. The test is functional as a standalone item, and seems to fill a gap. Well, we don't test everything and I don't remember problems in quoting in the past, at least not enough to add another test. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Add function for quote_qualified_identifier?
Bruce Momjian escribió: Brendan Jurd wrote: On 9/29/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we need more than one person's request to add this function. Well, I don't expect it would get requested. Most DBAs would likely look for the function in the docs, see it's not there and then just implement it themselves. Obviously it's not critical. But anticipating those little requirements and providing for them is one of the things that makes a piece of software a pleasure to use. Batteries included and all that. I was just looking for someone else to say Yea, I would like that too. Probably pgsql-hackers is not the best place to ask. -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Add function for quote_qualified_identifier?
On 9/29/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we need more than one person's request to add this function. Well, I don't expect it would get requested. Most DBAs would likely look for the function in the docs, see it's not there and then just implement it themselves. Obviously it's not critical. But anticipating those little requirements and providing for them is one of the things that makes a piece of software a pleasure to use. Batteries included and all that. Anyway, I seem to be flogging a horse which, if not dead, is surely mortally wounded. If quote_qualified_ident isn't desired, perhaps you can still use the regression test I included for quote_ident in the patch. The test is functional as a standalone item, and seems to fill a gap. Thanks for your time, BJ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Add function for quote_qualified_identifier?
Tom Lane wrote: Brendan Jurd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Patch includes documentation and new regression tests. While I was in there I also added regression tests for quote_ident(), which appeared to be absent. This seems rather pointless, since it's equivalent to quote_ident(schemaname) || '.' || quote_ident(relname). Has anyone every asked for this functionality? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Add function for quote_qualified_identifier?
On 9/29/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone every asked for this functionality? I searched the list archives for previous mentions of the topic, and didn't find any. So the answer to your question is yes, but so far it seems to be just me. Cheers, BJ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Add function for quote_qualified_identifier?
Brendan Jurd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Patch includes documentation and new regression tests. While I was in there I also added regression tests for quote_ident(), which appeared to be absent. This seems rather pointless, since it's equivalent to quote_ident(schemaname) || '.' || quote_ident(relname). regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Add function for quote_qualified_identifier?
On 9/23/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This seems rather pointless, since it's equivalent to quote_ident(schemaname) || '.' || quote_ident(relname). Yes it is, and I brought that up in the OP: I wrote: Clearly a DBA could just create this function himself in SQL (and it wouldn't be difficult), but is that a good reason not to have it in our standard set of functions? But since nobody arced up about it I thought I might as well move things along and produce a patch. Many of the functions provided by postgres are easy to write yourself. That doesn't mean they shouldn't be there. After all, there is *exactly* one way to do quote_qualified_ident. Why require every DBA who needs this functionality to go through the motions? I'll admit that it's a minor improvement, but that seems reasonable given it has a miniscule cost. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
