The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> And, actually, for some reason I hadn't thought of the tsearch as being
> another 'INDEX' type ... I crawl back over and be quiet now :)
>
> Oleg, as far as commits are concerned, I have no problems with extending
> the privileges to one of your guys for this, just em
And, actually, for some reason I hadn't thought of the tsearch as being
another 'INDEX' type ... I crawl back over and be quiet now :)
Oleg, as far as commits are concerned, I have no problems with extending
the privileges to one of your guys for this, just email me seperately who,
and I'll get i
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Why part of the core distribution, and not just left as a loadable module,
> > like it is now?
>
> The day I can go 'CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX ...' just like MySQL can I will be a
> very happy chappy...
>
with new tserach v2 we're pretty close t
The Hermit Hacker kirjutas R, 20.06.2003 kell 08:28:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > > Is there a strong reason why tsearch isn't in gborg?
> >
> > I think text search is a pretty important facility that should
> > eventually be part
> Why part of the core distribution, and not just left as a loadable module,
> like it is now?
The day I can go 'CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX ...' just like MySQL can I will be a
very happy chappy...
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > Is there a strong reason why tsearch isn't in gborg?
>
> I think text search is a pretty important facility that should
> eventually be part of the core distribution. It's more likely to get
> there from co
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Is there a strong reason why tsearch isn't in gborg?
I think text search is a pretty important facility that should
eventually be part of the core distribution. It's more likely to get
there from contrib than from gborg ...
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
> > > Is there a strong reason why tsearch isn't in gborg?
> > >
> >
> > How gborg could help us submitting changes to pgsql CVS ?
>
> It wouldn't ... is there a reason why tsearch needs to be in the pgsql
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > Is there a strong reason why tsearch isn't in gborg?
> >
>
> How gborg could help us submitting changes to pgsql CVS ?
It wouldn't ... is there a reason why tsearch needs to be in the pgsql CVS
any more then, say, ODBC drivers, or the tcl interface, o
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if contrib/tsearch is a "killer" feature, but we hope to
> > submit completely new version of tsearch V2 before July 1. Actually, we
> > have stable code already used in some projects but c
10 matches
Mail list logo
