-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
> I've done the above and now withdraw my complaints about this patch.
Excellent, thank you.
> I notice however that the patch seems to have touched only about half a
> dozen of the information_schema views ... shouldn't more of the
I wrote:
> If you're really intent on making it work this way, my vote is to
> expose namespace.c's isOtherTempNamespace() as a SQL-callable function,
> and add a test on that to the info-schema views, rather than relying on
> is_visible or explicit knowledge of the temp-schema naming convention.
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... I can't think of a use case where a user would not want to
> append a "is_visible" clause to the query above. That or start
> tracking which pg_temp_ schema belongs to whom.
Well, I'm still having a problem with this, because it seems like a
