* "Dave Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
| There seems to be enough interested parties to support both build tools.
| For the folks that want a Makefile, they can support it. If someone
| wants to support the build.xml file, then we should encourage it. I
| suspect that one of them will bec
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 11:14:22PM -, Dr. Evil wrote:
>
> There is a bunch of documentation for prepared statements in PG's
> JDBC, it seems that the only thing prepared statements do is throw
> exceptions.
>
> Here's some code I'm trying:
>
> String newvalue = "This is a ne
I have a table like this:
CREATE TABLE foo { number INT, name VARCHAR(100), email VARCHAR(100));
and I am trying to do this with a prepared statement:
PreparedStatement st = db.prepareStatement("UPDATE foo SET ? = '?' " +
"WHERE number = ?");
Whenever I use this I get a "Par
There is a bunch of documentation for prepared statements in PG's
JDBC, it seems that the only thing prepared statements do is throw
exceptions.
Here's some code I'm trying:
String newvalue = "This is a new value";
int accountnumber = 54;
String q
Dave Cramer writes:
> The one issue I have with a non ant based build system is that it
> makes it difficult to build the driver on a windows machine.
That is a valid concern that we're going to have to think about before
we move to another method.
> What problems does ant present?
* Ant ne
Hi all,
I have been listening to the discussions about Ant
and the build system.
I think that the discussion is missing a point,
which I will try to make here :-)
1. Standard
The Ant build system is making its way to be a "de
facto" standard for building java applications as
it is built for
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > compile the JDBC driver via ant if Java and ant are installed. (Or, rather, I
| > should be able to)
|
| You can also install GNU make on Windows.
This is how we used to build or apps on Windows before Ant, but we portability
issues with respe
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| * Ant needs to be installed. Of course this is not that much of a
| problem because you can simply install it. However, in automated build
| environments this might not be so easy, so people are just going to opt to
| leave out the JDBC driver.
Ned Wolpert writes:
> 3) Java is system independant, and the JDBC driver is a client piece. I should
> be able to compile the JDBC driver outside of PostgreSQL server if I wanted to,
> right? Example, I can't compile PostgreSQL on windozes 95. But I could
> compile the JDBC driver via ant if J
Gunnar Rønning writes:
> How do distributors that need to build all driver types proceed ?
I haven't seen one yet, but theoretically they should configure several
different build trees from one source tree. Of course, this doesn't work
with Ant, but it's trivial with GNU make.
--
Peter Eisent
Dave Cramer writes:
> The one issue I have with a non ant based build system is that it makes
> it difficult to build the driver on a windows machine.
That is a valid concern that we're going to have to think about
before we move to another method.
> What problems does ant present?
* Ant needs
11 matches
Mail list logo
